Powered by Blogger.
Thursday, June 13, 2013
Believers, take not Jews and Christians for your friends.
Koran: 5:51
Koran: 5:51
The Bible and Torah are viewed as merely corrupted versions of the Koran and are full of error. Their only merit is that they point toward the coming of Muhammad
Warfare against non-Muslims is fully justified in order to bring (or force) the superior (and only true) way of life of Islam to them
To leave Islam is to challenge its truth and supremacy. This is an insult to Islam and anyone doing this is “no better” than a non-believer (kuffar) and hence deserves to be killed.
To leave Islam is to challenge its truth and supremacy. This is an insult to Islam and anyone doing this is “no better” than a non-believer (kuffar) and hence deserves to be killed.
Hone your understanding of the true Evil of Islam.
The Koran is a criminal book against humanity and anyone believing it is the word of God is an enemy of humanity. When you realise that "Warfare against non-believers is to be understood as a gift to them as it brings them into contact with the only true religion of Islam" then you have come face to face with the true Evil of Islam.
The Koran is a criminal book against humanity and anyone believing it is the word of God is an enemy of humanity. When you realise that "Warfare against non-believers is to be understood as a gift to them as it brings them into contact with the only true religion of Islam" then you have come face to face with the true Evil of Islam.
Defenders of indiscriminate multiculturalism see criticism of Islam as a kind of ethnocentrism, and therefore consider the criticism a moral crime and an error of cognitive simplemindedness. Ethnocentrism means judging another culture based on the values and standards of your own culture.
But committed multiculturalists fail to notice that these criticizers of Islam (or at least most of them) are not criticizing all other religions; but only Islam (and maybe Scientology), which should lead them to recognize that the criticism is something other than mere ethnocentrism. And they haven't noticed that Islamic texts are themselves extremely ethnocentric.
I came across a good summary of the ethnocentrism of Islam on the excellent blog, The Malsi-Tung Social Virus. I suggest you subscribe to it. The author doesn't post very often, but when he does, it is excellent reading. Here's his summary — information that would cause smoke to spew from the ears of most indiscriminate multiculturalists:
Cultural superiority:
Legitimacy of Islamic domination:
Imposition of Islamic law upon all people is a moral duty:
Internal controls:
If this is not ethnocentrism in its most virulent form, what is?
As the author, Greg Hamilton, writes, "There are real and profound differences between cultures...Anthropologists developed the concept of cultural relativism in order to help them gain more accurate insights into alien cultures." An ethnocentric anthropologist's observations probably wouldn't be as accurate as an open-minded, non-judgmental anthropologist's. But as Hamilton points out, cultural relativism "is obviously a useful and valid doctrine in the context of anthropology but where it has become extremely problematic is in the transfer to the political domain."
Yes. If you politically grant concessions to Islam because you don't want to appear ethnocentric, you have allowed an extremely ethnocentric culture to override your less ethnocentric culture — for the purpose of avoiding ethnocentrism!
Or, put another way, tolerance should not mean tolerating intolerance. It's a self-defeating proposition.
If you can get this message through to a committed multiculturalist, after the smoke has stopped spewing, she or he may look at the situation differently in the future. That's all we need.
But committed multiculturalists fail to notice that these criticizers of Islam (or at least most of them) are not criticizing all other religions; but only Islam (and maybe Scientology), which should lead them to recognize that the criticism is something other than mere ethnocentrism. And they haven't noticed that Islamic texts are themselves extremely ethnocentric.
I came across a good summary of the ethnocentrism of Islam on the excellent blog, The Malsi-Tung Social Virus. I suggest you subscribe to it. The author doesn't post very often, but when he does, it is excellent reading. Here's his summary — information that would cause smoke to spew from the ears of most indiscriminate multiculturalists:
Cultural superiority:
- Jahiliya is the doctrine that every culture preceding Islamisation is in a state of ignorance
- The Bible and Torah are viewed as merely corrupted versions of the Koran and are full of error. Their only merit is that they point toward the coming of Muhammad
- All forms of non-Muslim culture are inferior or evil: democracy, music, figurative art, free thought, drinking alcohol, mixing of the sexes etc.
- Muhammad is the final messenger of God and what he teaches supercedes all other beliefs
Legitimacy of Islamic domination:
- Warfare against non-Muslims is fully justified in order to bring (or force) the superior (and only true) way of life of Islam to them
- Muslims in mixed societies are to be seen as superior to non-Muslims and they are justified in exploiting, deceiving, and plotting to overcome the non-Muslims
- The dhimma pact underwrites the justified domination of Muslims viz a viz Jewish and Christian communities living under Muslim domination. The inferior status, absence of legal protection, and resumption of persecution following any (perceived) failure to uphold the dhimma pact are all justified because Muslims have both a right and a duty to dominate non-Muslims
Imposition of Islamic law upon all people is a moral duty:
- Jihad is the sixth pillar of Islam. It is not simply defensive but a moral obligation upon all Muslims to replace all other culture and religion with Islam
- Warfare against non-believers is to be understood as a gift to them as it brings them into contact with the only true religion of Islam
Internal controls:
- To leave Islam is to challenge its truth and supremacy. This is an insult to Islam and anyone doing this is “no better” than a non-believer (kuffar) and hence deserves to be killed.
- To question Islam or Muhammad is to be guilty of doubting the truth of Islam. This is an insult to Islam and warrants a death sentence.
If this is not ethnocentrism in its most virulent form, what is?
As the author, Greg Hamilton, writes, "There are real and profound differences between cultures...Anthropologists developed the concept of cultural relativism in order to help them gain more accurate insights into alien cultures." An ethnocentric anthropologist's observations probably wouldn't be as accurate as an open-minded, non-judgmental anthropologist's. But as Hamilton points out, cultural relativism "is obviously a useful and valid doctrine in the context of anthropology but where it has become extremely problematic is in the transfer to the political domain."
Yes. If you politically grant concessions to Islam because you don't want to appear ethnocentric, you have allowed an extremely ethnocentric culture to override your less ethnocentric culture — for the purpose of avoiding ethnocentrism!
Or, put another way, tolerance should not mean tolerating intolerance. It's a self-defeating proposition.
If you can get this message through to a committed multiculturalist, after the smoke has stopped spewing, she or he may look at the situation differently in the future. That's all we need.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(Atom)
Check The Pulse
Translate
Categories
Arab Spring Stuff
(10)
Australian Stuff
(6)
Child Abuse
(99)
Female Genital Mutilation
(9)
Honor Killing
(13)
Islam can be fun
(107)
Islam Evil
(442)
Islam Misunderstood
(325)
Islamalice
(110)
Islamic Claptrap; Dhimmitude; Taqiyya; Tabarruj etc
(398)
Islamic Justice: Sharia
(170)
Islamic Misogyny
(187)
Islamic Paedophilia
(89)
Islamic Paranoia
(79)
Islamic Savagery
(273)
Islamic Suicide Bombing
(64)
Islamophobia
(152)
Israeli Stuff
(32)
Jewish Issues; Anti-Semitism; Jew- Hatred
(131)
Outrageous
(31)
Political Correctness
(89)
Political Lies
(116)
Sciency Stuff
(32)
UK Stuff
(15)
USA: Administration Lies
(57)
War; Terrorism; Brutality; Violence; Bloodshed; Savagery
(282)
Women's rights
(142)
Archives
Popular Posts
-
Kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God, history, and religion. This saves your honor. God is with you. Hajj Amin al Huss...
-
Lo this (Qur'an) is a conclusive Word; it is not a thing for amusement. It is no pleasantry. And it is no joke. Koran: 86:13 A single ...
-
The Prophet said, 'Isn't the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?' The women said, 'Yes.' He said, 'T...
-
The Prophet said, 'Were it not for the believers who do not want me to leave them, I would certainly and always go forth in army units ...
-
You may have whomever you desire; there is no blame. Koran: 33:51 ISLAM: GREATEST ANTI – WOMAN HATE IDEOLOGY EVER CONCEIVED. That ideolo...
-
If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, take the evidence of four witnesses from amongst you against them; if they testify, confine th...
-
Cutting edge Islamic feminism is constantly finding new roles for women in Islam, beyond the default one of staying inside and never talking...
-
Allah's Apostle said, 'I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say,"None has the right to be worshipped but All...
-
The Prophet said: 'I was shown the Hell Fire and the majority of its dwellers were women who are disbelievers or ungrateful.' When ...
-
Allah's Apostle said, 'If a fly falls in your drink, dip all of it into the cup and then throw it away, for in one of its wings the...
Blogroll
Blank
This is blank too
Zilch
This is blank
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Please be Truthful and polite.