Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Segregated Seating Row
Do any of these numbnuts KNOW who Professor Krauss is? These people should feel privileged that he graced their door with his shadow. As for the host, Islamic Education and Research Academy (iERA), it is a pretence organisation dedicated to proselytisation Islam. Why is Prof. Krauss wasting his time trying to light a spark with flat-earther neurons anyway?The Huffington Post UK | By Tom Moseley
An academic says he threatened to walk out of a debate hosted by the Islamic Education and Research Academy (iERA) because organisers tried to segregate the audience.
Professor Lawrence Krauss, one of the world's leading atheists, was lined up to debate against Islamic lecturer Hamza Andreas Tzortzis at University College London on Saturday.
Women were reportedly told by organisers to sit separately from men and couples.
Krauss refused to participate in the debate, entitled 'Islam or Atheism: Which Makes More Sense?' until they changed their minds.
He tweeted: "Almost walked out of debate as it ended up segregated + saw 3 kids being ejected for sitting in wrong place. I packed up and they caved in."
Krauss posted a link to a video and account of the row from a woman who said she had been told "women were to sit in the back of the auditorium, while men and couples could file into the front."
Zayd Tutton of the iERA disputed Krauss' account of events.
Speaking to the Huffington Post UK, he said: "There were three sections as agreed with UCL prior to the debate. This was agreed clearly with UCL representatives.
"Muslim women choosing to adhere to orthodox Islamic principles in sitting in their own area had their own section.
"As for those who wanted to sit together, male or female, they had their own section where they freely mixed and sat together from the beginning."
Tutton also said the "3 kids" mentioned by Krauss were in fact two men who forcibly tried to sit in the female section.
He said: "When arguing it was about sitting in any area in the auditorium, they were offered an entirely free aisle in the aforementioned Muslim female section, but insisted that they wanted to sit in between the Muslim females, with a view to offending their religious beliefs.
Do any of these numbnuts KNOW who Professor Krauss is? These people should feel privileged that he graced their door with his shadow. As for the host, Islamic Education and Research Academy (iERA), it is a pretence organisation dedicated to proselytisation Islam. Why is Prof. Krauss wasting his time trying to light a spark with flat-earther neurons anyway?The Huffington Post UK | By Tom Moseley
An academic says he threatened to walk out of a debate hosted by the Islamic Education and Research Academy (iERA) because organisers tried to segregate the audience.
Professor Lawrence Krauss, one of the world's leading atheists, was lined up to debate against Islamic lecturer Hamza Andreas Tzortzis at University College London on Saturday.
Women were reportedly told by organisers to sit separately from men and couples.
Krauss refused to participate in the debate, entitled 'Islam or Atheism: Which Makes More Sense?' until they changed their minds.
He tweeted: "Almost walked out of debate as it ended up segregated + saw 3 kids being ejected for sitting in wrong place. I packed up and they caved in."
Krauss posted a link to a video and account of the row from a woman who said she had been told "women were to sit in the back of the auditorium, while men and couples could file into the front."
Zayd Tutton of the iERA disputed Krauss' account of events.
Speaking to the Huffington Post UK, he said: "There were three sections as agreed with UCL prior to the debate. This was agreed clearly with UCL representatives.
"Muslim women choosing to adhere to orthodox Islamic principles in sitting in their own area had their own section.
"As for those who wanted to sit together, male or female, they had their own section where they freely mixed and sat together from the beginning."
Tutton also said the "3 kids" mentioned by Krauss were in fact two men who forcibly tried to sit in the female section.
He said: "When arguing it was about sitting in any area in the auditorium, they were offered an entirely free aisle in the aforementioned Muslim female section, but insisted that they wanted to sit in between the Muslim females, with a view to offending their religious beliefs.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(Atom)
Check The Pulse
Popular Posts
-
Satan wanted to meet them in Paradise, but the keepers prevented him from entering. He went to a snake, an animal with four feet like a cam...
-
The Muslims met them with their swords. They cut through many arms and skulls. Only confused cries and groans could be heard over our battle...
-
Believers, approach not prayers with a mind befogged or intoxicated until you understand what you utter. Nor when you are polluted, until af...
-
The Inspector General released a report this week and found that 63% of scrutinized IRS applications were withdrawn or were still unresolved...
-
Allah made booty lawful and good. He used it to incite the Muslims to unity of purpose. So enjoy what you have captured. Ishaq:327 “T he...
-
Believers, take not for friends your fathers and your brothers if they love disbelief above belief. If you do, you do wrong. Say: If your f...
-
Each time we sleep with a houri (heavenly virgins) we find her virgin. Besides, the penis of the Elected (Muslims in heaven) never softens. ...
-
So, fight them till all opposition ends and the only religion is Islam. Koran:8:39 As bad as Assad is, he is a secular ruler under whom mi...
-
I am the best of plotters. I deceived them with My guile so that I delivered you from them. Ishaq: 323 T he Arab League is calling fo...
-
Do the bastards think that we are not their equal in fighting? We are men who think that there is no shame in killing. Ishaq:489 Ac...
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Please be Truthful and polite.