Powered by Blogger.
Monday, May 06, 2013
The Apostle swore that there was no believer who had parted from the world and wanted to return to it for a single hour even if he could possess it with all it has except the martyr who would like to return and fight for Allah and be killed a second time.
Ishaq:400
Ishaq:400
It’s fine for Americans to “refuse to live in fear.” It’s not fine for the Obama administration to insist that we live in denial.
The Obama administration is quite worried about stereotyping Muslims as violence-prone terrorists. They fear that any acknowledgment that some Muslims commit acts of terror because they are religiously motivated (however twisted the terrorists’ interpretation of Islam may be) is to encourage a backlash of intolerance (at best) and violence (at worst) against Muslim Americans.
According to the FBI’s compilation of hate crime statistics, there were 1,480 incidents of religiously motivated crimes in America in 2011. Of these, 63.2 percent were directed at Jews, 12.5 percent at Muslims
Well thank you very much for clearing that up Mr Obama. So let me see if I get it... the Jews are FIVE TIMES more likely to be the victims of a hate crimes than these whiny muslims. Nevertheless, a punch in the jaw or a knife attack on an individual muslim, is the equivalent of shredding flesh and murdering innocents with nails and ball-bearings and smashing planes into buildings slaughtering thousands?
Today's news made by « suntimes »
It’s not crazy to worry about anti-Muslim violence. There have been vicious attacks on innocent Muslims. Last November, a Queens, N.Y., man was stabbed six times as he stood outside his mosque by an attacker who shouted “F------ Muslim, I’ll kill you.” In the wake of the Boston bombing, a drunk Northern Virginia man reportedly attacked and broke the jaw of a cab driver (an Army reservist who served in Iraq and at Guantanamo) after snarling “If you’re a Muslim, you’re a (expletive) jihadist.”
Anti-Muslim bigotry clearly exists, as does bias against every other group or conceivable group in American society. It’s also fairly uncommon.
According to the FBI’s compilation of hate crime statistics, there were 1,480 incidents of religiously motivated crimes in America in 2011. Of these, 63.2 percent were directed at Jews, 12.5 percent at Muslims, and little over 9 percent at Catholics and Protestants. The rest were all over the map.
As Andrew McCarthy, who prosecuted the first World Trade Center bombers, has said regarding Muslims who serve their country: “Without them, we could not have infiltrated jihadist cells in New York and stopped terrorists from killing thousands of people. Without them, we could not have translated, understood and processed our evidence. . . . Pro-American Muslims serve honorably in government, in our military, in our intelligence services and in our major institutions.”
Can the Obama administration likewise acknowledge that exaggerated efforts to avoid the appearance of prejudice can lead to problems of its own? Can it see that failing to take Maj. Nidal Hasan’s progressively more radical religious views seriously as a security threat was a disaster? Does the administration recognize that its subsequent official description of the Fort Hood attack as “workplace violence” was a bad joke? Can it now admit that losing track of Tamerlan Tsarnaev, after repeated warnings from the Russians, was a politically correct blunder?
This administration’s efforts to deny that Islamism has anything to do with terror have led it into embarrassing circumlocutions and denials. CIA Director John Brennan testified before Congress: “Our enemy is not ‘terror’ because terror is a state of mind, and as Americans we refuse to live in fear. Nor do we describe our enemy as ‘jihadists’ or ‘Islamists’ because jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam.”
It’s fine for Americans to “refuse to live in fear.” It’s not fine for the Obama administration to insist that we live in denial.
Anti-Muslim bigotry clearly exists, as does bias against every other group or conceivable group in American society. It’s also fairly uncommon.
According to the FBI’s compilation of hate crime statistics, there were 1,480 incidents of religiously motivated crimes in America in 2011. Of these, 63.2 percent were directed at Jews, 12.5 percent at Muslims, and little over 9 percent at Catholics and Protestants. The rest were all over the map.
As Andrew McCarthy, who prosecuted the first World Trade Center bombers, has said regarding Muslims who serve their country: “Without them, we could not have infiltrated jihadist cells in New York and stopped terrorists from killing thousands of people. Without them, we could not have translated, understood and processed our evidence. . . . Pro-American Muslims serve honorably in government, in our military, in our intelligence services and in our major institutions.”
Can the Obama administration likewise acknowledge that exaggerated efforts to avoid the appearance of prejudice can lead to problems of its own?
It’s quite possible, likely in fact, that most Americans are aware of the distinction between the majority of Muslims who are law-abiding, patriotic and indispensible in the fight against Muslim extremism, and the small minority of Muslims who are Islamists. Doubtless most Americans, who are fair-minded, non-prejudiced people, vehemently condemn acts of bias or violence against Muslim Americans.Can the Obama administration likewise acknowledge that exaggerated efforts to avoid the appearance of prejudice can lead to problems of its own? Can it see that failing to take Maj. Nidal Hasan’s progressively more radical religious views seriously as a security threat was a disaster? Does the administration recognize that its subsequent official description of the Fort Hood attack as “workplace violence” was a bad joke? Can it now admit that losing track of Tamerlan Tsarnaev, after repeated warnings from the Russians, was a politically correct blunder?
This administration’s efforts to deny that Islamism has anything to do with terror have led it into embarrassing circumlocutions and denials. CIA Director John Brennan testified before Congress: “Our enemy is not ‘terror’ because terror is a state of mind, and as Americans we refuse to live in fear. Nor do we describe our enemy as ‘jihadists’ or ‘Islamists’ because jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam.”
Does the administration recognize that its subsequent official description of the Fort Hood attack as “workplace violence” was a bad joke?
Brennan also expressed the hope that the Obama administration could “build up” the “more moderate elements within Hezbollah.” If Hezbollah is considered to contain moderates, it’s no wonder that James Clapper, director of national intelligence, described the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as “largely secular.”It’s fine for Americans to “refuse to live in fear.” It’s not fine for the Obama administration to insist that we live in denial.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(Atom)
Check The Pulse
Translate
Categories
Arab Spring Stuff
(10)
Australian Stuff
(6)
Child Abuse
(99)
Female Genital Mutilation
(9)
Honor Killing
(13)
Islam can be fun
(107)
Islam Evil
(442)
Islam Misunderstood
(325)
Islamalice
(110)
Islamic Claptrap; Dhimmitude; Taqiyya; Tabarruj etc
(398)
Islamic Justice: Sharia
(170)
Islamic Misogyny
(187)
Islamic Paedophilia
(89)
Islamic Paranoia
(79)
Islamic Savagery
(273)
Islamic Suicide Bombing
(64)
Islamophobia
(152)
Israeli Stuff
(32)
Jewish Issues; Anti-Semitism; Jew- Hatred
(131)
Outrageous
(31)
Political Correctness
(89)
Political Lies
(116)
Sciency Stuff
(32)
UK Stuff
(15)
USA: Administration Lies
(57)
War; Terrorism; Brutality; Violence; Bloodshed; Savagery
(282)
Women's rights
(142)
Archives
Popular Posts
-
Kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God, history, and religion. This saves your honor. God is with you. Hajj Amin al Huss...
-
The Prophet said, 'Were it not for the believers who do not want me to leave them, I would certainly and always go forth in army units ...
-
The Prophet said, 'Isn't the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?' The women said, 'Yes.' He said, 'T...
-
You may have whomever you desire; there is no blame. Koran: 33:51 ISLAM: GREATEST ANTI – WOMAN HATE IDEOLOGY EVER CONCEIVED. That ideolo...
-
Lo this (Qur'an) is a conclusive Word; it is not a thing for amusement. It is no pleasantry. And it is no joke. Koran: 86:13 A single ...
-
If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, take the evidence of four witnesses from amongst you against them; if they testify, confine th...
-
Cutting edge Islamic feminism is constantly finding new roles for women in Islam, beyond the default one of staying inside and never talking...
-
Preserve their chastity except with their wives and the slave girls they possess - for which there is no blame. Koran 70:28 Saudis don’...
-
The Prophet said: 'I was shown the Hell Fire and the majority of its dwellers were women who are disbelievers or ungrateful.' When ...
-
Allah's Apostle said, 'If a fly falls in your drink, dip all of it into the cup and then throw it away, for in one of its wings the...
Blogroll
Blank
This is blank too
Zilch
This is blank
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Please be Truthful and polite.