Powered by Blogger.

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Misunderstanding the 'religion of peace'. Again!

Thanks to: Sydney morning Herald

"FAR-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders has called the Prophet Muhammad a murderer and used Anzac soldiers as an example of the courage needed to speak out against Islam". Really! Then Ratsinger is far right too.


Islamists and the dhimmi media and politicians slam the door on any conversation they don't like. They don't care that A lie is a lie even if everyone believes it and the truth is the truth even if nobody believes it. If they are right and everyone else is wrong, how the hell am I going to find out if they ignite their pyrotechnics when I am trying to listen?

Yet these same numbnuts would happily give airtime to this ‘astronomy researcher’  to explain ‘scientifically’ why the earth is flat by using the Koran as his reference paper. Refusing this idiot airtime would somehow be Islamophobic. Apparently, killing off a debate with a reputable politician by whining about his exposé of outrageous extremism (which does nothing to diminish his argument) is kosher.



The de facto ignorant, or those trolling for votes, do not want to hear new ideas because they already know everything there is to know about the world. Their reflexive overreaction plays directly to the media and they are shit-scared to offend that touchy and perpetually offended section of our society, the Islamists. The media portrays those who have the courage to break through barriers to find out what Wilders has to say as “members of the ultra-conservative local group the Q Society of Australia”. Crap. I would like to hear what Wilders has to say and I am not a member of that society and I am not ultra-conservative.

But I am shit scared to attend his meeting because the Islamists have a proven unsubtle debating style...
  
and I need my head on my neck.

Wilders said the Prophet Muhammad was a savage leader of a gang of robbers that raped and murdered and mutilated its opponents including the Jews in 7th century Medina and violence had carried on to Islam's modern day supporters. He said anyone who criticised Islam "is in grave personal danger" and "we cannot continue to accept this".   I don’t care what the prophet Muhammad did over a millennium ago. He is not my prophet and none of his “doings” affect me today. EXCEPT when my freedom to speak and freedom to listen freely is stamped out by those that want me to play with their medieval toys.

The protest organiser Feiyi Zhang said: "we're here to show we will not stand for Wilders' racism and Islamophobia". She said his speech “could incite violence against Muslims" and “general fear of Islam".

What does she mean by "incite violence against Muslims"? Oh! Like the pics above.

What does she mean by “not stand for”? I expect she means that she is willing to debate him politely and point out his misunderstanding of the religion of peace? Yup

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Please be Truthful and polite.

Check The Pulse

Translate

Archives

Popular Posts

Blogroll

Blank

This is blank too

Zilch

This is blank