According to Arabic squiggly media, during a recent conference in Egypt, Dr. Abdul Rahman al-Birr—the mufti of the Muslim Brotherhood—declared that...“Israel will soon be gone, for it is a foreign body in the region and [its] history, and that Jerusalem will be liberated, not at the hands of the previous Muhammads but the current one, President Muhammad Morsi."

According to reports, he also added that "the attempts of some to separate Egypt from Palestine will not succeed" and that "the mujahidin [jihadis] will remain in Palestine and in Egypt to liberate Jerusalem.”

However, in a recent statement, al-Birr said he was taken out of context, that the "liberation" of Jerusalem at the hands of Morsi was not his prediction, but rather a tradition among the rabbis of Israel, who, according to the Brotherhood's mufti, knew that Israel's demise was inevitable, and that it would come not at the hands President Muhammad Anwar al-Sadat, nor Muhammad Hosni Mubarak, but the “third Muhammad”—the Muslim Brotherhood’s Muhammad.

Nice. Well these numbnuts should get together with Frankie the Pope who has just finished an exorcism on some Jinns and apparently the Wiggles are free next week and the gnome at the bottom of my garden is keen to participate in a spruikfest about... marijuana or virgins or anything...

Ever since 9/11, every time some place or another on the planet has been struck by a major jihadist act, the mainstream media have reliably come out with stories about “backlash” against Muslims.

Not accounts of actual backlash, mind you, but pieces in which various academics, public officials, Muslim leaders, and other sensitive souls have been described as wringing their hands over the dreaded possibility that some of us boorish infidels might respond to this latest action by going on the warpath against innocent Muslims.

Ever since 9/11, every time some place or another on the planet has been struck by a major jihadist act, the mainstream media have reliably come out with stories about “backlash” against Muslims. Not accounts of actual backlash, mind you, but pieces in which various academics, public officials, Muslim leaders, and other sensitive souls have been described as wringing their hands over the dreaded possibility that some of us boorish infidels might respond to this latest action by going on the warpath against innocent Muslims. If these “backlash” articles have been such a staple of post-9/11 journalism, it’s obviously because they’ve offered the media an opportunity to focus not on the innumerable Muslim-on-infidel atrocities that have actually taken place but, rather, on hypothetical, and violent, infidel-on-Muslim responses – and thus to persist in casting Muslims in the role of victim, even while the bodies of those they have slaughtered in Islam’s name have yet to go cold.

THE message from the young men was blunt: "You're not in Australia now."
They weren't standing on a street in Iraq, Afghanistan or Lebanon.
This is Bankstown. Sydney. Australia.

A recent two-year federal parliamentary inquiry into multiculturalism was swamped by concerns about the rising influence of Islam in Australia and fears that organisations such as Hizb ut-Tahrir and conservative imams were "promoting the radicalisation of second-generation Muslim youth and voluntary social exclusion".

"This was thought to support the formation of Muslim-only enclaves, leading to long-term problems such as unemployment," said the report, released in March.

Saudi women to be forced to stay at home to protect their chastity

Islam is an anti-women creed that preaches women to be inferior to men, having lower intelligence and inheritance rights, are compared to dogs and donkeys, to be subjugated to polygamy with no right to divorce their husbands, could be unconditionally beaten by husbands (4:34), and are compared to fields to be ploughed by men any time and any way they want (2:22). There are some 151 verses in the Koran dealing with women and 102 or 67% of those are demeaning to them. While in the Hadiths, 93% of the texts dealing with women are demeaning to them.

a law proposed by the government against sexual harassment in newly mixed workplaces was “only meant to encourage consensual debauchery”

These are the smarmy muhammanoid arseholes you dredge up when you trawl the sewers of Islam.

Give a little slack here because these defective brains are the product of centuries of inbreeding with you sisters and cousins.... and drinking camel piss.

This imbecile apparently wrote a self-help book called "The Joy of Talking". The pbublisher dropped the last word of the title "Bullshit".

This Beheading Should Be a Seminal Moment in Our Tolerance of Islam

It is difficult for Westerners who have to toil long and hard to put food on the table for their family to comprehend that there is a ‘culture’ out there which is hell bent on destroying the West, destroying all we stand for.

The gruesome beheading of one of our soldiers in a London street should be the final wake-up call for those who have been too slow to awaken from their slumbers. It should be plain for everyone to see by now that we are dealing with a force of darkness.

In my book, The Dawning of a New Dark Age, I warned in strong words that something would have to be done to keep Westerners safe from the danger that is Islam. Many might have thought that my words were alarmist. Today’s beheading in Woolwich, London proves them wrong. I have been vindicated.

Gunmen kill female polio worker in NW Pakistan, 5 Shiite Muslims killed in bomb, gun attacks

The latest attack against people involved in efforts to eradicate the crippling disease from this violence-torn country.

Pakistani militants have alleged in the past that the polio workers are U.S. spies and that the vaccine makes people sterile.

Yes the Polio Vaccine makes Muslim scrotums shrivel and fall off. Inshallah!
The West has a clandestine campaign to sterilise muhammanoids to stop their rabbit-like inbreeding. The aim is to replicate Australia's successful myxomatosis cull of the rabbit plague.

Muhammanoids know that polio is cured by praying to Allah the peachy and his sidekick Muhammad the paedophile murderer.
These prayers are clearly effective, as can be witnessed by the earthquakes and tsunamis that Allah, the too much and his sidekick Muhammad the paedophile and murderer, have used in the past to eradicate dumbass Muslims. Inshallah! Muslims slaughtering other Muslims is clearly part of the divine plan also. Inshallah!

Imbibing camel piss is a cure for polio. See Bukhari: V7B71N590 quote above.

You can try this as well from  Bukhari: V7B71N673 "Allah's Apostle said, 'If a fly falls in your drink, dip all of it into the cup and then throw it away, for in one of its wings there is a disease and in the other there is healing, an antidote or treatment for that disease.'"

Time to listen to this heroic woman.
Another Islamist terror attack, another round of assurances that it had nothing to do with the religion of peace.

Memo to the BBC: The killers were shouting "Allahu akbar" as they struck. Yet when complaints rained down on the BBC about Mr. Robinson's word choice, he felt obliged to atone. One can only wonder at people who can be so exquisitely sensitive in protecting Islam's reputation yet so utterly desensitized to a hideous murder explicitly committed in the name of Islam.

This happens every time. Muslim men wearing suits and ties, or women wearing stylish headscarves, are sent out to reassure the world that these attacks have no place in real Islam, that they are aberrations and corruptions of the true faith.

I've seen this before. A Muslim terrorist slays a non-Muslim citizen in the West, and representatives of the Muslim community rush to dissociate themselves and their faith from the horror. After British soldier Lee Rigby was hacked to death last week in Woolwich in south London, Julie Siddiqi, representing the Islamic Society of Britain, quickly stepped before the microphones to attest that all good Muslims were "sickened" by the attack, "just like everyone else."

The question requiring an answer at this moment in history is clear: Which group of leaders really speaks for Islam? The officially approved spokesmen for the "Muslim community"? Or the manic street preachers of political Islam, who indoctrinate, encourage and train the killers—and then bless their bloodshed?

Importing beggars

A consequence of Labor’s new “compassionate” border policies, which left the door wide open:

A new underclass of 100,000 asylum seekers, living on as little as $220 a week and with no rights to work, could be created in just five years if current trends continue.

Charities have warned they are unable to cope with the rising tide of impoverished asylum seekers, with one centre in Melbourne’s south-east closing its doors to new clients after being ‘’swamped’’ with requests for food aid…

Since October 2011, 16,477 people have been released on bridging visas while their claims for protection are considered. Of these, 7256 are subject to the government’s no-advantage policies, meaning they have no rights to work and are eligible for just 89 per cent of the dole - about $220 a week.
Immigration Department secretary Martin Bowles insisted at a parliamentary hearing on Tuesday there had been no ‘’freeze’’ on processing asylum seekers’ refugee applications - even though not one of the 19,760 who arrived after August 13 has had their claim processed.

We are importing a very big social problem.

Frankie performs his first exorcism – but the Vatican plays down the alleged banishing of four demons

The pilgrim, said to be a 43-year old married man from Mexico called Angelo, convulsed briefly and emitted a long sigh. His body went limp and his mouth dropped open.

Precisely the same thing would happen, I reckon, if Justin Bieber were to lay his hands on a teenage girl – or even a boy.

the man had been possessed by demons, and that the Pope had carried out his very first exorcism

But the head of the International Association of Exorcists – Father Gabriele Amorth – claims that the man had been possessed by demons, and that the Pope had carried out his very first exorcism.

And he’s angry that the Vatican downplayed the incident, although it used ambiguous language that did not deny altogether that Francis had tried to rid the man of evil.

Said Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi:

The Holy Father did not intend to carry out any exorcism. Instead, as he often does for sick and suffering people, he simply intended to pray for a person who was presented to him.

No, no, NO protested Amorth, who says the man was possessed by no fewer than four demons:

It was a real exorcism. If the Vatican has denied this, it shows that they understand nothing.

Amorth added that there was now, more than ever, a need for exorcists to combat people possessed by “sorcerers” and “Satanists”:

We live in an age in which God has been forgotten. And wherever God is not present, the Devil reigns.

He acknowledged that many people, even Catholics, regarded exorcism as mumbo-jumbo but insisted they were mistaken.

Those who don’t believe should read the Gospels. Jesus continually performed exorcisms. Today, unfortunately, bishops appoint too few exorcists. We need many more. I hope that Rome will send out directives to bishops around the world calling on them to appoint more exorcists.

He said John Paul II had carried out many exorcisms during his pontificate, but that Benedict XVI had not performed any, instead leaving it to bishops and priests.

John Paul II fought many times against Satan. Those battles continue, even though he is dead. In fact he is present today in many exorcisms. If you cite his name during an exorcism, the person who is possessed literally froths at the mouth in fury.

I would venture that it doesn’t take an exorcism to make people “froth at the mouth in fury” at the mention of John Paul’s name. After all, he failed miserably to respond to the sex abuse of children endemic in the Church, and his opposition to artificial birth control, including the use of condoms to prevent the spread of HIV, served to compounded poverty and was the direct cause millions of preventable AIDS deaths.

MUSLIM WOMEN 'CONSPIRED TO FORCE MARRIAGE' ON YOUNG GIRL

Here again (and again and again and again) the media reprts on this heinous Islamic practice, but never mentions the I-word. As for the Brits, they can't allow sharia and sharia courts, sharia no-go zones and then say, oh, oops. They have to ban the sharia, outlaw the courts and take a stand for Western law. As for the Muslimas who tried to force this poor young woman, this is their culture and their ideology. They are trapped. They do not fight, they submit. They are as big a part of the problem as the men.

The judge is pathetic for saying that this was "a very sad case." It is an outrage. Women as chattel and the inherrent misogyny is not sad, it's monstrous, and should be responded to as a grievous human rights abuse.
Pam Geller: Jihad watch

How the hell can Muslim women live the lives of domestic animals? Because in Islam, that is what they are. Koran(2:223) - "Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will."

Islam's rule of numbers and the beheading in London

In London last week, two Muslim men shouting jihad’s ancient war-cry, “Allahu Akbar” beheaded a British soldier with a cleaver—in a busy intersection and in broad daylight. They boasted of their crime in front of passersby and asked to be videotaped.

As surreal as this event may seem, Islamic beheadings are not uncommon in the West, including the U.S.

In 2011, a Pakistani-American who helped develop “Bridges TV”—a station “designed to counter negative stereotypes of Muslims”—beheaded his wife.